- Groundwork
- Market Engagement
- Groundwork
- Market Engagement
Summary of the Bwlch Y Groes Peatland Restoration Project
The Roberts family have been farming at Pennant Farm in Wales for several generation and focus predominantly on beef and sheep farming. In 2020, they started to explore the restoration of one of their peatlands, a 66-hectare degraded blanket bog in Bwlch Y Groes, using a mixture of finance from the sale of carbon units (credits) and public funding from the Welsh government. They sold 2,335 carbon units via the IUCN UK Peatland Code (the Peatland Code) under a 35-year agreement to a brewery company in Cheltenham, England, making this first carbon-funded peatland restoration project in Wales.
Farm Profile:
- Location: Gwynedd, Wales
- Size of Land: 66 hectares
- Land Ownership: Owner occupiers
- Nature Market Primary Focus: Peatland Carbon
- Interventions: Peatland restoration (rough grazing, revegetating, blocking gullies)
- Project Partners: Snowdonia National Park Authority, Forest Carbon
Acknowledgements
With many thanks their time and insight on this case study:
Lisa Roberts, Farmer, Pennant Farm
Rachel Harvey, Peatland Officer, Snowdonia National Park Authority
Date published: 11/12/2023
Key Takeaways
- To baseline and measure the site, the Roberts family received direct support from Snowdonia National Park Authority (SNPA) that wanted to trial the use of the Peatland Code.
- Baselining took around a week, led by the SNPA, and showed that of the 90 hectares of blanket bog, 66 hectares was eligible under the Peatland Code.
- SNPA worked with the Roberts to design the restoration, maintenance and monitoring plans. For example, livestock grazing will be maintained on the peatland in low stocking densities.
- Going forward, the Roberts are in charge of maintenance works and informal monitoring, but are also receiving further support from SNPA and National Resources Wales.
Why did the Roberts want to use the Peatland Code?
Lisa Roberts and her husband participate in several agri-environment schemes, including a Wales-based pilot that explores ways for farmers to develop their natural capital.
As part of this pilot, in 2018, the Roberts family assessed the farm’s peatland, including one site covering a 90-hectare degraded peatland that is used for non-intensive grazing. It is located on the edge of Snowdonia National Park in a valley called Bwlch Y Groes.
Roberts came across the Peatland Code, which had launched three years before, in her research around peatland restoration and its carbon benefits. She then connected with an officer at Snowdonia National Park Authority (SNPA), Rachel Harvey, who was seeking a farming partner to trial peatland restoration using the Peatland Code.
After the Roberts’ agreement to participate, Harvey was assigned with leading the process, including the site surveying and project design.
The Peatland Code offered the Bwlch Y Groes project several advantages. It sets out a scientific methodology for assessing the current state of peatlands and how much carbon can be avoided when they are restored. It measures this in tonnes of ‘CO2 equivalent’ (CO2e), the key metric on which sellable units are based. It also set out several processes for monitoring, community engagement and additionality, which also help to increase buyer confidence.
How long will the agreement last?
Under the Peatland Code, sites must be maintained for 30 years minimum. The Roberts family, who had owned the site for several generations, agreed to commit to 35 years. “Luckily, we’re a young family and we plan to retain ownership of the farm, so we were able to get comfortable with this aspect,” comments Roberts.
How was the peatland baselined?
Harvey and the SNPA team undertook ground surveying and desktop mapping using digital datasets.
Desktop mapping initially took around four hours on GIS software. Harvey used several different aerial images to identify the site and annotate a ‘site map’ with details such as the site boundaries, access points, notable features, and the GPS co-ordinates.
The ground surveying of the site then took around four days by Harvey, who used a peat probe for measuring soil depth across 68 survey points, and a mobile phone for tracking GPS co-ordinates, taking pictures at each survey point, and recording information.
This baselining confirmed that the site was eligible under the Peatland Code. Of the 90 hectares within the site, 66 hectares were classified as blanket bog with peat soils of over 0.5m depth across 70% of the survey points. The condition of the peatland was confirmed as a mixture of ‘actively eroding’ and ‘drained with haggs and gullies’, as defined by the Peatland Code. You can find a copy of the site map here.
Harvey has since put together a ‘How To’ Guide for navigating the Peatland Code process.
What did restoration involve?
While the SNPA had research and expertise in peatland restoration, there were certain elements to clarify with the Roberts family to get them comfortable with the project.
For example, the Roberts family want food production to remain the central activity of Pennant Farm. “As one of the first movers in this space, we wanted to show that peatland restoration can be done alongside sustainable food production,” says Roberts. The peatland is used as rough grazing for livestock, but because the area is an SSI protected site and stocking densities are regulated, there was no need to reduce the number of grazing animals.
The restoration took two months to plan, but Harvey now notes with experience this can take as little as one week.
The restoration activity focused on reprofiling the eroding haggs, with one main gully blocked for rewetting and some re-vegetating of bare peat.
Roberts comments that the restoration work went smoothly over several weeks in January 2019 with no notable issues, assisted by the road access to the site and mild weather conditions at the time.
Across 35 years, the restoration will have prevented over 2,335 tons of CO2e from entering the atmosphere, with an equivalent 2,355 units being verified over this time.
How is the site being monitored and maintained after implementation?
Different levels of monitoring are undertaken by the Roberts family and the SNPA.
The Roberts family handle informal monitoring of the site, including visual checks over the hagg complexes and the gully block. The SNPA undertake more detailed reviews, including the monitoring reports required by the Peatland Code. More regular monitoring is planned for the first five years of the project, as this is when the peatland restoration activities are at highest risk of reversal.
As for maintenance, the Roberts family is in charge of any necessary maintenance activity, and costs are built into the financial model of the project.
The Roberts family had initial concerns about being able to maintain the peatland without a formal skillset, but Harvey and the SNPA have agreed to provide advice and support on this where needed. The Roberts also signed an agreement with National Resources Wales to officially help with monitoring over the long-term.